Abstract
In the current reform era, the realization of good governance must be supported, among others, by law
enforcement against corruption. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of
1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the legal basis used in Indonesia. Several cases of
judge's interpretation in a Corruption Case are needed to provide clarity regarding whether or not the
elements of a crime have been fulfilled. This thesis discusses "Implementation of Judges' Interpretation of
the Violation of Elements Contrary to the Obligations of Civil Services in Corruption Cases (Case Study of
the Corruption Court Decision Number 132 / PID. SUS / TPK / 2017 / PN.JKT.PST." , With the problem and
purpose of knowing the forms of legal interpretation in the Corruption Case and the application of the
judge's interpretation to the case study. This research was obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary
legal materials which were then analyzed in a descriptive normative manner Analytical interpretation
methods and also the construction of law are not permitted in criminal law The Panel of Judges in this
case adopted a systematic interpretation in their decision In this case Law Number 31 of 1999 concerns
Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to
Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption Crimes is linked to Act Number 5 of 2014 of the State Civil
Apparat us (ASN) concerning Civil Servants.